Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Novels. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Novels. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Papias and the Mysterious Menorah -- A Review

PAPIAS AND THE MYSTERIOUS MENORAH: The Third Art West Adventure. By Ben Witherington III and Ann Witherington. Eugene: Pickwick Publications. 262 pages.


It’s interesting that leading biblical scholars have recently taken to writing novels, apparently with an eye to communicating their ideas to a wider audience that’s more likely to read a novel than an academic monograph. Marcus Borg did it with his Putting Away Childish Things (Harper One, 2010), a book I reviewed for the Christian Century. In that book Borg shares his own progressive/liberal view of religion and biblical studies. Unknown to me at the time, Ben Witherington, a professor at Asbury Theological Seminary, together with his wife Ann, a biology professor at Asbury College, has done much the same thing – only they have written a trilogy of books with an archaeological adventure theme. Considering that Ben Witherington has been a strong critic of the Jesus Seminar, of which Borg is a founding member, it shouldn’t surprise readers that his novel takes a rather different approach to biblical history than does Borg. Whereas Borg’s novel offers a progressive/liberal perspective, the Witheringtons’s book is clearly evangelical in its orientation. The two together provide an interesting contrast in perspectives.

I was asked to review the third Art West Adventure by the authors’ publicist, which I agreed to do even though I’d not having read the previous two installments. Doing so may be a bit like watching Revenge of the Jedi without watching the previous two installments of the Star Wars series, but since I’d read Borg’s volume, I thought it worth looking at something written by one of Borg’s leading critics.

Taking up this task, I encountered a book with three primary threads that the authors attempt to weave together – sometimes successfully and at other times less so. Early on in the book the authors deal with the threads in alternating chapters, which is rather typical of a novel, but it can also be distracting. In this case, there was one thread that seems to continue a story line from the previous volume, but which doesn’t connect well with the other two threads. This line of thought concerns a Charlotte Bobcat basketball player who is a Palestinian Christian, who had been a Muslim involved with Hamas, and who after conversion changes his name from Ishmael to Yakov, and ends up facing revenge for his rejection of Islam and Hamas. Oh, and Jake the Cat Arafat is boarding with Art West’s mother in North Carolina. I’m not too sure how this thread advanced the story line, but each reader will have to decide if it’s germane or not.

Leaving aside this particular story line, the primary focus of the novel concerns two important archaeological finds that are alluded to in the book’s title. . The first thread concerns an archaeological dig in Turkey that involved the figure of Art West, an American Methodist evangelical biblical scholar/archaeologist (a sort of Christian Indiana Jones – and yes reference to Indiana Jones is made in the book). The dig is located at Hierapolis, a center of Greco-Roman religion and early Christian prophetic enthusiasm. It focuses on Papias, a rather obscure 2nd Century CE bishop, whose references to the traditional authorship of the Gospels are found in the work of Eusebius. One of the features of this story seems to be Witherington’s desire to lift up the possibility that the gospels aren’t anonymous documents, but carry the identities of their actual authors – though he attributes the identity of the Beloved Disciple to Lazarus and not John the Apostle. Papias is, according to this story, a chiliast – a strong believer in the coming millennium, whose theology is directly influenced by the author of the Book of Revelation.

Any good novel needs a bit of romantic tension, and the Witheringtons provide it in the form of an attractive secular Turkish archaeologist named Dr. Marissa Okur. The confirmed bachelor who is now in his 50s develops feelings for his younger colleague who is leader of the dig, which raises the jealousy of another Turkish colleague, who will engage in some mischievous actions designed to either rid himself of his American rival or take credit for a major discovery. Of course, the question will be – are these to be unrequited feelings or not? And, of course, as an evangelical Christian, Art is concerned about being “unequally yoked.” You will have to read the book to find out how this tension will be resolved.

This discovery is the house of Bishop Papias, a domicile that provides important clues to the bishop’s theology and confirmation of theories of authorship and transmission of scripture, for in this house is found manuscripts of a long lost series of volumes that interpret the gospels and speak of their transmission – the volumes that Eusebius quotes from two centuries later. Here is a major find that would revolutionize our understandings of the Christian faith (if this were fact and not fiction).

The second thread that is mentioned in the title concerns a Menorah that is owned by a Muslim antiquities dealer. Having been purchased several decades earlier, the owner, Kahlil Said, has decided to give the menorah to Jewish friends, the bride to be being an archaeologist in her own right, as a wedding present. But first he must prove that he has properly obtained this menorah to the Israeli Antiquities Agency, and in the course of proving this, he discovers the presence of two pieces of paper, both of which appear to be ancient, and are hidden within the hollow core of the menorah. Both pieces of paper will prove intriguing and even dangerous. What is discovered is that this is no ordinary menorah. Not only was it ancient, it appears to have come from Herod’s Temple, making it the oldest menorah known and the only artifact known to exist from that Temple. Needless to say that when the wedding occurs, the menorah isn’t the present – but the intrigue that goes with discovering the nature of its existence proves to be an adventure in itself.

Since this is a review of a novel, I’ll leave the rest of the details of the story line to one’s imagination. As I noted in my review of the Borg book, I’m not much of a reader of novels, and so I’m not the best judge of literary style, but I know what I like. I did find this novel to have a degree of movement and adventure that wasn’t present in the more sedentary Borg novel. It is a pretty good tale that moves along fairly quickly. The inclusion of quotations in the Greek may be off-putting to some, but fortunately the authors provide translation – though perhaps the presence of the actual Greek in the text really isn’t needed to carry the story along. And, depending on your starting point you may find the little evangelicalism – like concern for being “unequally yoked” endearing or perhaps a little silly. I found some of these statements a bit odd considering that they supposedly come from the lips of a distinguished biblical scholar, but perhaps that’s due to my having been absent from the evangelical mainstream for some time.

Even as Borg attempted to lay out his view of a metaphorical interpretation of the biblical text, the Witherington book seems to be offering an imaginative rendering of a very traditional view of the transmission of scripture. Perhaps this is an area of conversation that needs further development, for it is a much more conservative view than I learned at Fuller and taught at the Bible college that employed me. What, I wonder is the rationale for such an interpretation of authorship, other than the assumption that if written by eyewitnesses or those who heard the story of Jesus from eyewitnesses gives these texts greater authority in a skeptical age. Due to the nature of this genre these questions are left hanging, but perhaps that’s the purpose – opening up a conversation about the importance of authorship to authority.

Although this isn’t Hemingway or even Dan Brown, it’s an interesting story that raises interesting historical questions in a “novel” way. And if you need another view than mine, consider that of Richard Baukham, who says of the book – on the back cover -- that each of these “archaeological thrillers is more enthralling than the last.” Baukham may be a bit biased, as the book is dedicated to him and he is mentioned as an authority, I think it’s worth considering his esteemed judgment (especially since I’ve not read the previous two installments). As I noted in my review of the Borg volume, Jesus scholars understand better than most the value of story in communicating ideas. The Witherington’s, like Borg, should be commended for picking up this genre. Writing novels isn’t, I expect, as easy as some might think. And they do a commendable job, making this a book worth reading.



Saturday, May 15, 2010

The Galilean Secret -- Review

 THE GALILEAN SECRET: A Novel. By Evan Drake Howard. New York: Guideposts Books, 2010. 444 pages.



What would happen if someone found an authentic letter written by Jesus of Nazareth? What would it say? And how would impact our lives? That is essentially the question raised in this novel written by an American Baptist pastor and first time novelist. The book carries strong advance praise by such luminaries as Harvey Cox, Richard Rohr, and Joseph Girzone, persons who find in it a message of hope. And, indeed, that is the intent of the book – it is a message that seeks to bring together those who are estranged, including Jew, Christian and Muslim.

Drake seeks to emulate some of the mystery of Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code, without Brown’s skepticism. Like The Da Vinci Code part of the plot centers around Jesus’ relationship with Mary Magdalene, though in this novel the two are neither married nor sexually intimate. And yet there is a special relationship envisioned, one that gives occasion for this most priceless of letters.

In laying out the book, Howard alternates a first century narrative with a modern day narrative. In the ancient narrative, we see the gospel stories expanded. In this part of the story, Jesus has deep feelings for Mary, but decides that his mission necessitates celibacy. As he wrestles with his own feelings, he comes to an understanding of humanity that would revolutionize human existence. But Jesus and Mary aren’t the only characters in this plot line. Besides them there is Nicodemus the wise follower from within the Jewish power structure. There are the disciples, but they play a rather muted role. There are Zealots, led by Barabbas, and there is Judas. Somewhat like Jesus Christ Superstar, Judas plays a significant role.

In this telling of the story, Judas is a scoundrel who hangs with the Zealots. At one point he becomes attracted to the message of Jesus, or at least sees Jesus as a means to an end. Judas is money hungry – as often portrayed in the gospels and extra-biblical literature. But, in this novel, he’s also a bit of a lusty fellow. First he takes a shine to Judith – a significant fictional character in the novel – but she rejects his advances. She is, after all, the wife of another of the Zealots. Later, as he comes into contact with Jesus, he takes a shine to Mary. In fact, he even has a rather intimate encounter with Mary, who is feeling rejected by Jesus. You see, everyone has read the letter of Jesus to Mary, except Mary. But ultimately, she rejects Judas. In the end, Judas will betray Jesus, in large part because of jealousy of Jesus. But, then guilt gets the better of him and he commits suicide, but not before hiding a note explaining his betrayal in a cave in Gethsemane.

Jesus doesn’t really play a major role in the novel – except as the author of the letter. Howard intersperses Jesus’ sayings throughout the novel, borrowing from all of the gospels, but with a special focus on John’s gospel. The important piece, the one that will revolutionize everything is this secret letter, a letter that will later get hidden in a cave at Qumran.

This ancient plot line is accompanied by a modern one that includes a Muslim student named Karim, a Jewish peace activist named Rachel (along with brother Ezra, a Commander in the Israeli Defense Force), Brother Gregory, an expert in Aramaic, and a rather nasty archaeologist. This plot line starts with Karim, running away from his father’s Palestinian Militia and stumbling upon a scroll, that turns out to be a letter from Jesus to Mary. Spotted by the archaeologist, who tries to kill him in order to get the manuscript, which he believes belongs to him, he flees and gets caught up in a Palestinian protest, where he his wounded by IDF bullets, but is rescued by Rachel. The rescue leads to more chases and a new love story – a forbidden love story. This part of the story is full of chases, intrigue, and attempts to understand the revolutionary nature of this letter, which offers hope of peace among all peoples. I’ll leave the rest of the story for the reader to discover.

And what is this revolutionary message? Well, it seems that Jesus discovered that the key to happiness and peace is reconciling the feminine with the masculine within us. Yes, Jesus discovers his feminine side, and by bringing it to the fore his life is transformed – including his feelings for Mary. We can have the same sense of peace, if we too will affirm the feminine within us, and bring the masculine and the feminine into alignment.

As you can tell from the way I’ve laid this out, I’ve got problems with this line of thinking. It’s not that I have an issue with reconciling the feminine with the masculine, I just can’t find any strains of this in Jesus’ own thought. Howard seems to want to bring modern psychological theory into the teaching of Jesus, which just doesn’t seem to fit. Why one might ask, if this is such a revolutionary idea do we not see any hint of it in the gospel accounts? I’m not sure how this secret message found in a letter to Mary will bring Jew, Christian, and Muslim together in peace? The book is hopeful and calls for our attention to the message of Jesus. I’m just not sure that the message of the fictional letter either accomplishes the mission, nor does it sound all that like Jesus. It has gnostic elements to it, though Howard makes it clear that he’s neither a gnostic nor does he want to present a gnostic message. He’s trying to offer a middle ground.

As I conclude the review I must confess that I’m not much a reader of novels, so that may color my take. I found the book much too long and the plot lines too complicated. There are too many characters being developed so you find it difficult to follow the train of thought. The second confession is that my historian sensibilities kicked in, and so I wanted his Jesus to fit with my conception of Jesus as derived from the gospels. I don’t mind the speculations on whether Jesus had feelings for Mary, but I’m not sure I tracked well with his interpretations.

But, any one willing to offer hope of reconciliation between Muslim, Jew, and Christian deserves some attention.   So check this out.