There is little doubt that abortion is a complex and multifaceted issue. With divergent viewpoints and a muddled “middle ground," it is common for public opinion polls to yield seemingly contradictory results.
Despite the perceived difficulties in definitively determining abortion perspectives, recent developments expose a public that is steadily growing warmer to the pro-life point of view. If this trend continues, there will be intriguing social and political implications, especially considering the surprising stance Millennials are taking on the issue.
One could argue that the nation's ongoing abortion debate re-fueled and intensified following President Obama's controversial speech at the University of Notre Dame in May 2009. Since the widely publicized event, journalists and researchers have attempted to qualify recent polls that corroborate an increase in pro-life sentiments. In May 2009 Gary Langer, the director of polling at ABC News, wrote, abortion is “a highly fraught subject—and one of those on which a single polling number does not begin to describe the complexity of Americans' attitudes.”
Langer says that the majority of Americans are actually pro-life and pro-choice simultaneously. For instance, some people may believe that abortion should be legal, but only in specific cases (i.e. rape or if the woman's life is in danger). In this case, the stance calls for legal abortion (pro-choice sentiment), but only in very specific circumstances (pro-life sentiment). In either case, an individual who subscribes to these beliefs is essentially aligning him or herself with both poles of the abortion debate—albeit, to different degrees.
Interestingly, Langer is not alone in his conclusions. In May 2009, New York Times journalist Dalia Sussman urged readers to be cautious when jumping to the conclusion that America may actually be embracive of pro-life tenants. According to Sussman, “[Asking if someone is “pro-life” or “pro-choice”] creates absolutes, when in reality, abortion really represents an issue in which there aren’t any absolutes for many (if not most) people.”
While this may be a valid argument in terms of recognizing complexities in perception, it is entirely possible that a slight majority of Americans are still avoiding absolutes, while sliding, albeit slowly, toward a more pro-life world view. Statistics from multiple sources corroborate this notion. One does not have to be “absolute” in a belief to lean more in one direction than another.
Imagine a line on which one charts his or her support on a scale from zero to 10 (10 being “extremely favorable” of abortion rights). Now, picture millions of people plotted along this continuum. While individuals may hold diverse beliefs on the subject, chances are that a majority would find itself on either end (this is to say before or after the five, or middle ground, placement) of the spectrum. For instance, an individual who opposes abortion, yet thinks that it should be legal in cases of rape, may choose a three on the continuum, instead of a zero. Here, this person clearly opposes abortion, while possessing some sense that it should be permitted in select circumstances. Even though his or her opinion isn't an extreme (a zero or 10), the individual still leans more in favor of pro-life sentiments.
Despite resistance from some journalists and researchers who cannot fathom a reduction in support for pro-abortion arguments, public opinion polls continue to reflect a collective, albeit slow, movement away from pro-choice-ism. In Oct. 2009, the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life was one of many reputable sources to recognize a drop in support for abortion. Pew found that, while abortion supporters outnumbered foes in 2007 and 2008, the two sides are now equal in number. Additionally, Pew wrote that “there have been modest increases in the numbers who favor reducing abortions or making them harder to obtain.” And most surprisingly: “Less support for abortion is evident among most demographic and political groups.”
Perhaps most intriguing is the closure in the generational gap. According to Gallup, those Americans aged 18 to 29 and 30 to 49 were most supportive of abortion rights in the late 1970s. This pattern has evolved since 2000, with all age groups aside from seniors (65 and older), sharing similar views on abortion. Not surprisingly, seniors remain the “least likely to favor legal abortion.”
Now for the bombshell:
Gallup found that between 2005 and 2009, among those individuals who are 18 to 29 years of age, there has been a nine-percentage-point increase in the belief that abortion should be “illegal in all circumstances.” This essentially means that young Americans are nearly tied with seniors in their belief that abortion should be eradicated.
Interestingly, this group is also frequently pointed out by the left to be strongly in favor of more liberal social and political policy. However, young people appear to be moving more in line with conservatives on this issue, further corroborating the notion that Millennials may not be sold on progressive policies.
Make no mistake, opinions about abortion have not shifted radically on the whole. That said, public perception appears to be sliding in the pro-life direction. In 2001, Gallup asked respondents if they saw abortion has morally acceptable or morally unacceptable; 42% said that abortion is morally acceptable, with 45% stating the contrary. In 2010, this same poll found only 38% claiming that abortion is moral, with 50% stating the opposing view, that abortion is immoral.
Abortion will continue to be a highly controversial topic in American political and social circles, as both sides argue in support of their respective stances. With Millennials poised to inherit future leadership posts, the generation's less-favorable abortion perspective offers an intriguing conundrum to the left. In the end, it is the Millennial generation that will create the laws and monitor the policies that govern this highly contentious subject.
WRITTEN BY: Billy Hallowell with original article at Human Events available by clicking on the title of this blog entry
Search This Blog
Showing posts with label Gallup. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gallup. Show all posts
Monday, July 5, 2010
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Don't Believe the Polls
If there is one thing that history has taught anyone who has bothered to pay attention it is that polling lies when it is taken to be looking at results weeks before a national election. From the infamous "Dewey Defeats Truman!" headlines right up until the most recent election, when John Kerry was said to hold an 11 point lead in some polls with just weeks to go, polls lie, and I believe that they do it on purpose. Just as there is a quite obvious liberal news media bias that paints Democratic candidate Barack Obama in bright, positive, shining colors and portrays Republican candidate John McCain in a negative light, so are polling results skewed by the political agendas of the groups behind them. In that 1948 example, Harry Truman was seen trailing Thomas Dewey by anywhere from a 5 to 15 point margin, with Truman actually ending up on top by just over 4 points. After that embarrassing result for pollsters, the powers that be within their organizations trashed old systems and rolled out new ones in attempts to ensure that the same problems did not materialize again. David Moore in his 'The Super Pollsters: How They Measure and Manipulate Public Opinion in America' has stated: "Poorly worded questions and unrepresentative samples continually skew polls results. It is important that the validity of survey results be questioned and poll watchers need to always be attentive to the source of the poll and to the methods used in polling." Despite all of their attempts at refining their polling methods, and in spite of the occasional result that was in the end close to their polling samples, the fact remains that public opinion polling is at best an inexact science, and at worst a propaganda tool. Public opinion polls in this current election cycle have regularly shown Obama to hold anywhere from a 5-10 point lead, with John McCain only taking small, short leads and none of those recently. That is pretty incredible when you consider that virtually every reliable source continues to say that the country is divided evenly down the middle between conservative and liberal ideologies, and that the 'undecideds' are generally a myth in any significant numbers. I have a poll up at my own website here which shows McCain ahead by a 76-18 margin, with 6 percent stating support for an 'other' candidate. Anyone who wants to shill for the McCain campaign could easily see my poll and make the truthful statement: "I have seen some polls that show McCain way ahead of Obama." Sure you have, if you looked at mine, but my poll is in no way scientific, as the majority of folks who pass through the site are expected to be conservatives. The fact is that this election is not going to be decided until the voters go to cast their actual ballots on election day in 2 1/2 weeks. Until then the majority of polls, with liberal agendas behind them, will continue to skew the results towards Obama in an attempt to kill enthusiasm among Republicans. They want to plant the thought in Republican minds that "Hey, McCain can't win anyway, so I'm going to stay home." Nothing could be further from the truth, as George W. Bush's 2004 victory over John Kerry clearly showed. As of today, the Gallup poll shows Obama with a slim 2 point lead, basically nothing in an industry that says it's results have a margin of error of plus or minus 3-4 percent. Rasmussen has Obama up by 4, Zogby by 5. In other words, when factoring in their own error margins, the race could be anywhere from a 9 point Obama lead all the way down to a close McCain victory. I once heard someone say that they didn't need a weather man to tell them it was raining, all they needed to do was stick their head out the window. Likewise, I don't need some agenda-driven polling organization to tell me that this election is going to ultimately be decided by 2 points or less, and that it could go either way. The fact is that you need to get up and go out and vote on election day, and the fact is also that in more instances than not you should not believe the polls.
at
1:22 PM
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
