Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Europe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Europe. Show all posts

Sunday, November 28, 2010

Ed West: Multiculturalism is the new Communism

Ed West,
Multiculturalism is the new Communism, and about as likely to work
I have a book review in this week’s Catholic Herald of Roger Scruton’s The Uses of Pessimism. Professor Scruton is the leading conservative political philosopher of our age... His latest book explains how unscrupulous optimists have brought disaster on the world, from the Jacobins to the Bolsheviks, Nazis and Eurocrats, but his most controversial assertion is that mass immigration is the latest example of this utopian thinking, and doomed to never realise its unachievable aims

... the optimists are behind two related utopian ideas that dominate their age. The European Union, like Soviet Communism ...

As Scruton notes: “Since the 1960s western countries have adopted policies in the matter of immigration that no person schooled in the elementary truths of pessimism would have endorsed. Anybody who has studied the fate of empires, and the difficulties of establishing territorial jurisdiction over communities that differ in religion, language and marital customs, knows that the task is all but impossible, and threatens constantly to break down in fragmentation, tribalism or civil war.”

Like Communism, mass immigration was based on a denial of human nature, and an inability to distinguish between what might work in individual human relationships and in society as a whole. Just because people of different groups are capable of getting on perfectly well as individuals, becoming friends and falling in love, it does not mean that a multicultural society ... can become a racism-free paradise; anymore than the willingness of people to give money to perfect strangers means Communism can work.
File under: immigration is based on a denial of human nature.

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Europe: progressive ideology on course for ... civil war

Go back to where you are happy – German author on immigration issue
Udo Ulfkotte, a noted German journalist and author, known for his severe criticism of Islam, shared with RT his view on what is behind the integration dispute and where it may lead.

“What I believe is there is a place for Muslim in this world and for their culture, they have a place to live in,” Ulfkotte told RT. “And there is a place for European and Western culture to live in. What I don’t believe is they will live peacefully together. We have a clash not only of civilizations and religions, we have a clash of ideologies, like we had a clash between communism and capitalism. Now we have a clash because Islam is also an ideology. I believe that Islam is not going to win a battle.”

The journalist claimed that he does not believe that Muslims will overrun Europe. “Because I believe that what we have done in the past several times – the people will stand up and say ‘We are fed up, we don’t want that any more,’ and try to push them back. And that will be violent. I belong to Europe and to European culture and the Muslims belong to the places where they came from. Because whenever I ask the majority of Turks I speak to, and I ask them, ‘Are you German or are you Turkish?’ Even if they are second or third generation, they will say, ‘I’m Turkish.’”

“The Palestinians: if they live in Saudi Arabia as workers, they say, ‘I’m a Palestinian and my home is Palestine.’ I don’t blame them for that," said Ulfkotte. “I just say, ‘Okay. So if as they say they have their roots there, they are happy there, all the best. Take your suitcases and go back to where you are happy. I will be happy, you will be happy.” ...


Quote from end of the video ...
RT: what future do you predict for this continent?

Udo Ulfkotte: The financial and economical crisis, it looks like it will come back. And whenever you had in history... hard economical problems, ethnical unrest, and ... large groups not respect the state laws and the power of the state... when this respect is gone you had war or civil war.
Daniel Pipes, Europe's Stark Options
The possibility of Muslims accepting the confines of historic Europe and smoothly integrating within it can virtually be dismissed from consideration...

As the American columnist Dennis Prager sums them up, "It is difficult to imagine any other future scenario for Western Europe than its becoming Islamicized or having a civil war." Indeed, these two deeply unattractive alternative paths appear to define Europe's choices, with powerful forces pulling in the contrary directions of Muslims taking over or Muslims rejected, Europe an extension of North Africa or in a state of quasi-civil war.
Ayaan Hirsi Ali speaks on the loss of freedom in Europe
It is this state of affairs that makes Christopher Caldwell’s book Reflections on the Revolution in Europe: Immigration and the West ... which opens with the sentence, “Western Europe became a multi-ethnic society in a fit of absence of mind,” a chilling read...

Caldwell discusses this theme in an interesting light: he does not overlook the Europeans who feel that Islam is a danger to European values but asks, “How can you fight for something you cannot define?” And this is Europe’s problem – insecurity about who we are, what our various flags mean, why, with every turn, we spend less and less on the military.

Europe has become a place for new religions, new creeds, multiculturalism, cosmopolitanism, transnationalism. Everything is thus relative. This is an uncertainty that the Muslim does not share. The Muslim ethic and tribal spirit are far more resilient and fierce in war than the protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism...

In reality, if Europe falls, it’s not because of Islam. It is because the Europeans of today – unlike their forbears in the Second World War – will not die to defend the values or the future of Europe. Even if they were asked to make the final sacrifice, many a post-modern lily-livered European would escape into an obscure mesh of conscientious objection. All that Islam has to do is walk into the vacuum.
Fjordman: Review of Christopher Caldwell's Reflections on the Revolution in Europe
Whatever is going to happen in Western Europe over the coming decades is not going to be peaceful. In 2010 there are already conditions resembling civil war in many French and certain Dutch, British, German, Italian and even Scandinavian suburbs; Kalashnikov rifles are popular in immigrant neighborhoods in the EU capital of Brussels..
How Much Allah Can the Old Continent Bear?
American author and journalist Christopher Caldwell recently published his latest tome, "Reflections on the Revolution in Europe: Immigration, Islam and the West," ... he says ...

"It is certain that Europe will emerge changed from its confrontation with Islam. It is far less certain that Islam will prove assimilable...

When an insecure, malleable, relativistic culture meets a culture that is anchored, confident and strengthened by common doctrines, it is generally the former that changes to suit the latter"
Cultures in Conflict (On Muslim immigrants in Europe)
Caldwell writes...

"Muslim cultures ... have historically been either Europe’s enemies, its overlords, or its underlings. Europe is wagering that attitudes handed down over the centuries, on both sides, have disappeared, or can be made to disappear. That is probably not a wise wager...

Immigration is not enhancing or validating European culture; it is supplanting it."
Mark Steyn on why the fascists are winning in Europe
... in the room where they cook up European conventional wisdom, they could easily pin a sign on the door saying: “This Political Machine Creates Fascists.” ... politics evolved to the point where almost any issue worth talking about was ruled beyond the bounds of polite society... if the political culture forbids respectable politicians from raising certain issues, then the electorate will turn to unrespectable ones... You want to talk about immigration? Whoa, racist! Crime? Racist! Welfare? Racist! Islam? Racistracistdoubleracist! Nya-nya, can’t hear you with my two anti-racist thumbs in my ears! ... The problem in Europe is not a lunatic fringe but a lunatic mainstream ever more estranged from its voters.
Melanie Phillips, The clash of uncivilisations
To those at the bottom, who live outside the bubbles of wealth or ideology, the face of intolerance is all too easy to recognise. They can see the churches of Britain being steadily replaced by mosques, can no longer find a local butcher selling pork, or are being regularly intimidated by local youths declaring ‘this is a Muslim area’. They are in no doubt that they are watching the takeover of their country and civilisation...

Freedom can only be protected if its defenders are united. But with Britain’s collective brain turned to multicultural jelly, liberals are refusing to acknowledge the civilisational battle now under way and gathering pace.

The obsession with the ‘far right’ has cemented progressive opinion into its current lethal state of cultural somnambulism. Liberals must raise their eyes, raise their game and ask where this is leading. For there is far worse on the horizon than a nasty man on Question Time.
Greg Sheridan, East Timor plan lacks action and credibility
Gillard is emerging as a strangely weak and ineffective Prime Minister in foreign policy...

With nearly 6000 illegal immigrants arriving by boat so far this year, and with the government having no strategy to stop the boats, Australia stands in a precarious position. We seem just about to embark on the disastrous European policy, which is now tearing Europe apart, of accepting a large, illegal Muslim immigration.
Not totally strange, she and Rudd are not that far apart. And Big Kev did promise to bring the spirit of Europe down here:
The European Union of course does not represent an identikit model of what we would seek to develop in the Asia Pacific.

But what we can learn from Europe is this – it is necessary to take the first step.

In the 1950s, sceptics saw European integration as unrealistic.

But most people would now agree that the goal of the visionaries in Europe who sat down in the 1950s and resolved to build prosperity and a common sense of a security community has been achieved.

It is that spirit we need to capture in our hemisphere.

Our special challenge is that we face a region with greater diversity in political systems and economic structures, levels of development, religious beliefs, languages and cultures, than did our counterparts in Europe.

But that should not stop us from thinking big.
That's the spirit of open borders.

Gillard shares the same affliction as Rudd: she has no identity. She cannot defend Australia on subjective grounds i.e. because we desire to remain homogeneous. And her brain has been pickled by the ideology of non-discrimination, so she is blind to the consequences of diversity. She is the emotionally-paralysed and brain-dead leader of the lobotomised party.






File under: ominous non-debate.

Saturday, April 10, 2010

Polish President's Plane Crashes in Russia - No Survivors


Another crisis for Europe? Just what we needed.

Polish President Lech Kaczynski, his wife, and his entire entourage of Polish officials perished as his plane went down while attempting to land in western Russia, reportedly in "bad weather". Kaczynski was headed to Russia to commemorate the massacre of Polish soldiers by the Soviet Union during World War II.

The President was one of the Kaczynski twins... somewhat known as political rock stars in Europe. A huge number of Polish officials were on the flight. Luckily the Polish Prime Minister traveled to Russia for ceremonies earlier in the week and was on a different plane, part of a different delegation. But much of the government of a major European Country has just been lost in one incident.

This will be a developing story throughout the day and into next week. A huge story in Europe for sure.

Tensions may rise as the two Countries - Russia & Poland - generally don't get along. Kaczynski was considered pro-U.S. (perhaps too much so), but was disliked by the Russian government. So this could muddy relations between Russia & Poland, between Russia & the U.S., and between Russia & The West (NATO/EU). It could be a setback to what little progress has been made in relations between the U.S. & Russia and between Russia & Poland.

Poland is part of the geo-political chess board of Eastern Europe and the Caucasus where the U.S. and Russia are still fighting the Cold War, battling for influence and dominance (no the Cold War never really ended unfortunately...have been very annoyed by the fact that Obama has decided to keep it going). Other parts of that active chess board include the Czech Republic, Georgia, Ukraine, Kosovo, and Kyrgyzstan - another Country in chaos that the U.S. wants to maintain a footprint in...even though we shouldn't be there (recent events prove my point for why we should avoid these unstable Countries). The argument that the U.S. needs an airbase in Kyrgyzstan to support operations in Afghanistan is completely bogus. It's nonsense. The U.S. presence in and around these Countries has been more destabilizing than helpful. It has been destabilizing for the Countries, for the regions, for Europe & Central Asia, and for the world.

It would make more sense for Russia to hand the investigation over to a third party commission.... or any neutral party... such as the EU, OSCE, or the UN. I don't know if the people of Poland will accept anything that the Russians say.

Additional Report from Sky News

Saturday, February 13, 2010

E.U. 21st Century = U.S.S.R. 20th Century?


What lies behind the creation of the European Union, once believed to be simply a device to expand economic relationships and opportunities, but now quite obviously a major attack on individual nationhood? Could this same fate of sacrificing national sovereignty for some ideology occur here in the United States of America?

In 1957 six countries - West Germany, France, Italy, Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands - signed what became known as the 'Treaties of Rome' establishing a 'European Economic Community' which was an effort to both foster economic opportunity and to begin stepping away from the nationalism that many saw as the root cause of the two world wars that had devastated the continent during the first half of the 20th century.

In 1973 this union of nations was enlarged when Great Britain, Ireland and Denmark joined what had become known as the 'European Community' with institutions covering the economy, energy, and major industry. By the end of the 70's the first direct democratic elections to a 'European Parliament' were being held.

During the 1980's, Greece, Spain and Portugal all joined and a policy of open borders was developed that eliminated the need for passports across all of Europe. In 1986 a European flag was adopted and the 'Single European Act' was signed by member nations. This act expanded on the earlier 'Treaties of Rome' and set the goal of having a common market by the end of 1992.

On November 1st, 1993 the 'Maastricht Treaty' came into force. Signed by member nations in February of '92, the treaty formally established the EU and set into motion the creation of the 'Euro' as an official currency. Sweden, Finland and Austria joined up during the 90's, and in 2002 the euro replaced the old national currency in all of the member states.

During the last decade the membership role of nations exploded into eastern Europe to include places like Poland, Hungary, Romania and the Czech Republic, bringing to 27 the current total number of member states, though only 16 are included in what is known as the 'Eurozone' by accepting the euro as their official currency.

On December 1st, 2009 the 'Treaty of Lisbon' came into force after it was signed back in December of '07. This treaty basically centralized power and formalized the state symbols in the EU, weakening democracy by moving true power away from the voters in each nation and handing it over to the EU power structure, and moving one step closer to erasing individual nationalism.

It also established the first-ever official head of state, a long term 'President of the European Council' who is appointed to a 2 1/2 year term by the Council and who may be reappointed one time. Herman Van Rompuy of Belgium was selected as the first President, and is serving now until at least May of 2012.

It further and perhaps most frighteningly established an agency known as 'EuroPol', the European Police Force having full diplomatic immunity in enforcing criminal counts that include, as pointed out by former Soviet political prisoner Vladimir Bukovsky, nebulous charges such as 'racism' and 'xenophobia'.

As Bukovsky pointed out in a recent piece for the Cato Institute: "the authorities have already explained to us, in a very quiet manner, that those who might object to the immigration policy of the EU can be accused of racism. And those who oppose further integration of Europe can be charged with xenophobia."

The structure of the European Parliament was described as a "mad house" that makes the old Supreme Soviet of the USSR look "like a model legislature" due to it's 1,200-1,400 members who do not have a central meeting place and whose members normally only have an opportunity to speak in front of the group for meer minutes each year.

Why is it important to point out the old Soviet Union, which led the way to disillusionment, imprisonment, and death to millions of people during the 20th century? Because the EU is heading down the exact same socialist path, a path that has also reared it's ugly head in America with the election of Barack Obama to the Presidency here.

Back in the 1980's, with Gorbachev sensing power slipping from the increasingly damaged Soviet Union but still believing in the ideology of socialism, he met with the leaders of Europe's leftist parties who shared this vision and together they launched 'Common European Home', a project to organize socialism across all of Europe. They threw all of their considerable support behind the formation of the EU for this very purpose.

In today's Europe, behind the names and lines on your map and the pride of the people in the individual nations, a monster is swallowing up the old world. This behemoth is known as the European Union, a socialist body of cronyism and central government planning. Before the end of this century, if nothing major changes, it will lead to the same disaster that became of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the Soviet Union, in the 20th century.

The great challenge here in the United States is the same as it was during the USSR-led rush to embrace communism and socialism in the last century. That challenge is to not be a follower and join in the rush to give up our national greatness and identity, as well as our individual freedoms. It is the challenge to instead be a leader in the fight for freedom and democracy.

The American people still have the power that the European people have slowly allowed their politicians and power brokers to negotiate away from them. We have the power to stand up and be counted, to kick the socialists and central planners out on their cans, and to hold true to the values and vision of our Constitution.

Will the United States follow the European Union, which itself is following the old Soviet Union, down the path toward socialism by beginning to form some 'North American Union' with Mexico, Canada, and other nations of the Americas, yielding our power and our pride to some nebulous central authority? Or will we stand strong for true democracy and the individual freedoms and liberties given to us as true gifts from God himself? Only the passage of 21st century time will tell.

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

Live Free or Die


When I took my high school civics course, the teacher omitted one of the most important lessons: There’s no “free” lunch, and the biggest prices for free lunches come when they are served up by government. Those free lunches are seductive and hard to turn down, but the price is paid in growing increments of your freedom.

Mark Steyn, author of the classic America Alone, and a writer whose column appears in The Bulletin, makes this point brilliantly in a lecture prepared for Hillsdale College and reprinted in its publication, Imprimis. He writes that when he first moved to New Hampshire, he thought its motto, “Live free or die!” was formulated right before a battle to fire the troops up. Then he found that Gen. John Stark, a hero of the American Revolution, made that statement decades after battle in a letter explaining why he could not attend a dinner.

Due to health problems, he could not attend the 32nd reunion of the Battle of Bennington, but in his letter he formulated the motto, “Live free or die; Death is not the worst of evils.” The shorter version survived to become the state motto of New Hampshire.

Mr. Steyn said he found that was even more impressive and important coming at such a time long after battle. He reasoned it is easy to be prepared to battle for freedom in extreme times, but it is equally important to be so prepared at all other times: “It’s a bold statement of the reality of our lives in the prosperous West. You can live as free men, but if you choose not to, your society will soon die.”

In the same vein, he says everyone assumes his book America Alone is about radical Islam. He writes people assume it’s about “firebreathing imams, the excitable young men jumping up and down in the street doing the old ‘Death to the Great Satan’ dance. It’s not. It’s about us. It’s about a possibly terminal manifestation of an old civilizational temptation: Indolence, as Machiavelli understood, is the greatest enemy of a republic.”

You might say that eternal vigilance is the price of freedom, and indolence is the formula for loss of that freedom.

Mr. Steyn discusses what can kill our republic, and it is an enemy within … our own indolence and our lack of commitment to the motto “Live free or die!” He does this in an article in one of my favorite publications, Imprimis (April 2009). It’s a free, monthly publication but 10 times as valuable as most of the mainstream media such as The New York Times. (Call 800-437-2268 for a free subscription.)

Mr. Steyn started figuring this out when he ran into trouble in Canada with their so-called “human rights” commissions that accused his writings of being Islamophobic. He said he could not understand how, in this matter, the progressive left was making common cause with radical Islam. But then he realized what the two groups have in common overrides any seeming superficial differences:

Big government progressives and political Islam recoil from the concept of the citizen, of the free individual entrusted to operate within his own societal space, assume his responsibilities and exploit his potential.”

In most of the developed West, the citizen is losing his autonomy. The state is slowly taking over all of the responsibilities of the citizen — health care, child care, care of the elderly, etc. — “to the point where it’s effectively severed its citizens from humanity’s primal instincts, not least the survival instinct.”

Europe’s addiction to big government, unaffordable entitlements, cradle-to-grave welfare and a dependence on mass immigration is leading to its extinction. Now the U.S. is starting down the same road. President Barack Obama is giving the U.S. what has virtually destroyed Europe. He’s giving us big government, big taxes, unprecedented budgets, unsustainable deficits and national debt, and a welfare explosion with health care on the way and universal college education at government expense.

There are many problems with the European/Obama approach. The math just doesn’t add up. It is unsustainable. In Sweden, state spending amounts to 54 percent of GDP. In America we’re already up to 40 percent and, in four years, we’ll be approaching Sweden.

Incidentally, after the greatest, most undisciplined spending splurge in American history, President Obama recently said our spending, deficits and debt is unsustainable. He runs up more debt than all 43 previous presidents combined. And only then the Messiah Obama has figured out our spending is unsustainable. Now, all he has to figure out is who is responsible for all that spending — none other than Barack Hussein Obama.

But Mr. Steyn argues it’s not just the spending, the deficits, the debt, the out-of-control budgets and the financial statement of the nation that is the worst part of the problem. He said even if someone would write a check for all that spending, the damage would still be done: “Even if there were no financial consequences, the moral and even spiritual consequences would still be fatal. That’s the stage Europe’s at.”

We’re in a deep financial hole, losing our financial health, but more importantly, we’re in the process of surrendering our freedom and liberty to a big brother state. As government expands, freedom contracts. Big government provides a certain comfort to citizens, but it comes at an unacceptable price of loss of freedom.

Mr. Steyn points to the George Mason University survey of freedom in the U.S. The five least free states are Maryland, California, Rhode Island, New Jersey and the least free state, New York. Like the U.S., New York is in a financial hole and doesn’t know how to get out of it. So what does Gov. David Paterson of New York do to get out of the hole? He comes up with the biggest tax increase in New York history. He’s adopting the Obama strategy of assuming you can spend your way out of excessive spending by more spending.

Stage One: Your Worries Disappear With Your Freedom

There are various stages to Machiavelli’s “indolence.” The first stage comes when the government comes out with every program needed to make all your worries disappear — about your mortgage, your health, care of the elderly and everything else. As government moves in, there are strings attached. Once it gives banks or car companies money, it gets involved with many aspects of their business. The same for citizens.

Once it provides health care, it reasons if it controls your health care, it should have a say in all the things that determine your health. For example, in Britain, the obese are not entitled to hip and knee replacements. There are all kinds of such rules and all kinds of inconsistencies in such rules about life style choices and right to care. But as Mr. Steyn explains it, “Tyranny is always whimsical.”

Stage Two: Government’s Gifts Come With Strings Attached

What we’ve just described is that government’s beneficence comes with commands. In Britain, to save the planet, there is an extra tax on each trip beyond one a citizen makes. This really sounds like the way the Soviet’s controlled movement through requirements of exit visas. Now the British are doing that with exit taxes. In stage two, the state starts regulating your behavior.

There’s more and more of this regulation of behavior as citizens become wards of the state, with provision of their health, their education, their housing, etc.

Stage Three: Once Transformed To Wards Of The State, Government Regulates What You Think

Stage three comes when having made citizens wards of the state; there is an attempt to regulate not only what you do, but also what they think. In Canada, the government keeps foreign newspapers, foreign television operators and foreign bookstores out of Canada. And then it assumes that it has a right to police the ideas disseminated by the local newspapers, broadcasters and bookstores they allow to operate.

Stage Four: Big Brother Tells You What Not To Think

Then comes stage four, in which dissenting ideas and even words are labeled as “hatred.” In Britain, an author interviewed on BBC politely expressed concerns about gay adoption. He was investigated by Scotland Yard’s Community Safety Unit for Homophobic, Racist and Domestic Incidents. Mr. Steyn gives other examples that include the arrest and jailing of a Daily Telegraph columnist for a joke in a speech.

Mr. Steyn summarizes how government expansion leads to freedom contraction in places like England, Canada and even the U.S. He writes:

“The massive expansion of government under the laughable euphemism of ‘stimulus’ (Stage One) comes with a quid pro quo down the line (Stage Two): Once you accept you’re a child in a government nursery, why shouldn’t Nanny tell you what to do? And then — Stage Three — what to think? And — Stage Four — what you’re forbidden to think …”

Stage Five: The Descent Into Torpor And Triviality: The End Of Excellence And Achievement

And then comes Stage Five, the final stage. That’s where Europe is. It is producing nothing of excellence. No great science or great art. That’s still found in America. Europe isn’t even producing enough families to maintain its population. It is shrinking in population, productivity, power and seems on its way to extinction. Charles Murray, author of In Our Hands, explains this development: “Give people plenty and security, and they will fall into spiritual torpor. When life becomes an extended picnic, with nothing of importance to do, ideas of greatness become an irritant. Such is the nature of the Europe syndrome.”

Mr. Steyn explains it this way: When the state “gives” you everything, it’s not surprising that citizens stop functioning as adults and life becomes an extended adolescence. Gerald Ford said, “A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take away everything you have.”

Now in Europe, the reality is that a government big enough to give you everything you want isn’t big enough to get you to give any of it back. That’s where Europe is. The European model welfare state is unsustainable, but government can’t get its citizens to cut back. These countries can’t fix the situation they’re in and are heading for collapse.

America can still avoid the fate of Europe and get off the track it is on. Mr. Steyn writes: “They can rediscover the animating principles of the American idea — of limited government, a self-reliant citizenry and the opportunities to exploit your talents to the fullest — or they can join most of the rest of the Western world in terminal decline. To rekindle the spark of liberty once it dies is very difficult. The inertia, the ennui, the fatalism is more pathetic than the demographic decline and fiscal profligacy of the social democratic state, because it’s subtler and less tangible.”

Gen. Stark was right when he said, “Live free or die.” We have to decide whether or not we want to live free or continue on the path we’re now on to big government and shrinking liberty and freedom. The free lunch may seem delicious, but it is the most poisonous food a free society serves up. Those free lunches are toxic to freedom.

WRITTEN by Herb Denenberg at The Bulletin, Philadelphia's family newspaper, on May 19th, 2009

Saturday, July 26, 2008

The Eurack Obamapean

It has been described in the adoring old media as 'a sea of humanity' and 'hundreds of thousands of adoring followers'. Of course, I am talking about the crowds at rallies for United States Presidential candidate Barrack Obama's visit this past week to Europe for his speeches in front of the 'adoring throngs' - in Germany and France. Meanwhile, back home here in the good-old United States, where the election actually matters and among his own nation, Republican candidate John McCain chose to visit with and talk problems with real Americans. The Dems just don't understand the significance of the difference. A professor on public policy at George Mason University, Jeremy Mayer, is quoted as saying "...if you look at the pictures this week, McCain is speaking at a German restaurant in Ohio, and Obama is speaking before 200,000 Germans in Berlin” as if that is somehow a negative for McCain. Obama is speaking to a lot of Germans while American hero John McCain is speaking to a regular American-dream independent businessman, but somehow Obama's Euro-speech is more significant? Only to the liberal Kool Aid-drinking, Dem-supporting academic elites and the old media. With all the attention, Obama gained nothing in the polls during his big Euro-love festival. Liberal pundits are scratching their heads wondering what they have to do to get their candidate ahead. They just don't realize that there is little that you can do to fool the full 51% of the American population of Americans who support positions to the right of their far-left agenda. It is not enough that he chose Europe to make his big public push this week, Obama was also seen globe-trotting in the war-torn Middle East. Problem was that he once again found a way to alienate our troops while over there. He continued his strategy of putting forth two different positions at once, depending on whatever audience he was in front of at the time. Pull out the troops, keep a strong presence. Keep up the fight, time to end the war. Back and forth, flip and flop, two-faced to the end. Those liberal pundits will continue scratching their heads as to the tight polls right up until their election loss in November. They just don't get it, that the majority of Americans will always chose a real, proven American hero over a Euro-candidate any year.